✦ Business Set-up & ROC Compliance
assessment and appeals in Gurgaon
Partner-led incorporation that gets your name approved, your SPICe+ filed right the first time, and your post-incorporation deadlines met — before they become penalties.
Gupta Varundeep & Co. (GVC Audit) is a Chartered Accountant firm in Gurgaon handling end-to-end Private Limited Company registration — name reservation, DSC and DIN, MoA and AoA drafting, SPICe+ Part A and Part B, PAN, TAN and TDS set-up, and the INC-20A, ADT-1 and annual ROC filings that follow — for founders, MSMEs and foreign-owned subsidiaries across Gurgaon and Delhi NCR. Every incorporation is reviewed by a qualified CA, not handed to a junior processor.
- ICAI-Registered Chartered Accountants
- 100% On-Time Return Filing Record
- Serving Startups to ₹100+ Crore Enterprises
- Partner-Reviewed Filings, Every Month
20+ Years
200+
Under Section 249(2) of the Income-tax Act, an appeal before the CIT(Appeals) or JCIT(Appeals) in Form 35 must be filed within thirty days of receiving the assessment order. A weak, un-reconciled first reply to a scrutiny or reassessment notice lets the officer proceed on best judgment under Section 144, resulting in high-pitched tax demands and bank attachments under Section 226. GVC Audit delivers CA-led notice review, factual rebuttal drafting, Stay of Demand under Section 220(6), and appellate representation before CIT(A) and ITAT across Gurgaon and Delhi NCR.
Navigating proceedings under the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Income-tax Act, 2025
India's income tax framework transitioned to the Income-tax Act, 2025 effective from 1 April 2026. However, repeal and savings provisions ensure that existing assessments, reassessments, and appeals continue under the legislation governing the relevant tax year.
Assessment Years Ending Till 31 March 2027
Proceedings relating to tax years prior to 1 April 2026 continue to be governed by the substantive and procedural provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
- Pending scrutiny assessments under Section 143(3) and best judgment under Section 144
- Reassessment proceedings under Section 147 / 148 / 148A for earlier escaped income
- Appeals pending or filed before CIT(Appeals) in Form 35 or ITAT in Form 36 under 1961 Act
- Penalty proceedings under Section 270A, Section 271(1)(c), and Section 271B
Tax Year 2026–27 and Subsequent Years
Proceedings relating to tax years beginning on or after 1 April 2026 are governed by the Income-tax Act, 2025, featuring reorganized section numbering and consolidated procedures.
- New assessment and inquiry notices issued for Tax Year 2026-27 onwards
- Section 37(2)(g) disallowances on MSME supplier payments beyond 45 days
- Updated statutory appellate filing formats and electronic verification rules
- Consolidated penalty, prosecution, and settlement procedures under the 2025 statute
The 5-tier statutory dispute resolution and appellate hierarchy
Income tax disputes follow a structured statutory ladder. Building a solid factual and documentary record at the first reply stage is what wins cases at the higher appellate forums.
Assessing Officer · NFAC
- Scrutiny 143(3)
- Reassessment 147
- Best Judgment 144
Proceedings before the National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC) or jurisdictional Assessing Officer in Gurgaon. Written submissions, ledger reconciliations, and responses to draft assessment orders.
Review assessment defense ↓First Appeal · CIT(A) / JCIT(A)
- Form 35
- 30-Day Limit
- Faceless Appeals
Challenging high-pitched additions before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) or Joint Commissioner (Appeals). Drafting grounds of appeal, Statement of Facts, and Rule 46A additional evidence applications.
Explore CIT(A) representation ↓ITAT · Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
- Form 36
- 60-Day Limit
- Final Fact Court
Appealing before the ITAT Delhi Benches (Lok Nayak Bhawan / CGO Complex). The Tribunal is the final fact-finding authority. Compiling paper-books, case law digests, and arguing before Judicial and Accountant Members.
See ITAT litigation scope ↓High Court of Punjab & Haryana / Delhi
- Section 260A
- Substantial Law
- Writ Art 226
Appeals under Section 260A on substantial questions of law within 120 days of the ITAT order, or filing Constitutional Writ Petitions under Article 226 against arbitrary jurisdictional notices or natural justice violations.
Understand High Court appeals ↓Supreme Court of India
- Section 261
- Article 136 SLP
- Final Authority
Appeals under Section 261 upon High Court certification, or filing Special Leave Petitions (SLP) under Article 136 challenging conflicting High Court precedents or fundamental constitutional tax questions.
Review Supreme Court scope ↓Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP)
- Section 144C
- 30-Day Window
- MNC / TP Cases
Specialized collegium of three Principal Commissioners of Income Tax for foreign companies and transfer pricing cases. Filing objections against draft assessment orders before final demand issuance.
Explore DRP objections ↓Which income tax notice have you received?
Identify the section number printed at the top of your notice to understand the legal allegation, the statutory response deadline, and the immediate procedural remedy.
Section 143(1)(a)
- CPC Intimation
- 30 Days
Automated adjustment intimation for mathematical errors, Form 3CD Clause 44/22 mismatches, or incorrect deduction claims. Rectification in Section 154 or grievance response.
Section 142(1)
- Inquiry Notice
- As Stated
Statutory notice requiring submission of accounts, documents, bank reconciliations, or return filing. Failure to respond triggers ex-parte assessment under Section 144.
Section 143(2)
- Scrutiny Notice
- CASS Selection
Return selected for Limited, Complete, or Compulsory Manual Scrutiny. Requires comprehensive factual defense, ledger proofs, and legal submissions before the NFAC.
Section 148 / 148A
- Reassessment
- Escaped Income
Notice for reopening past assessment years on alleged escaped income. Requires challenging jurisdiction under Section 148A(b), filing return, and requesting reasons.
Section 144 Show Cause
- Best Judgment
- Critical
Final opportunity notice before the Assessing Officer passes an ex-parte assessment order based on departmental data, creating massive arbitrary tax additions.
Section 154
- Rectification
- Mistake Apparent
Application to rectify mistakes apparent from the record: uncredited advance tax / TDS, incorrect interest under 234A/B/C, or typographical processing errors.
Section 270A / 271
- Penalty Notice
- 50% to 200%
Penalty show cause notice for under-reporting (50% penalty) or misreporting of income (200% penalty). Requires proving bona fide explanations under Section 270A(6).
Section 220 / 221
- Demand Notice
- Stay Application
Notice of outstanding tax demand following assessment. Requires immediate filing of a Stay of Demand application under Section 220(6) with 20% deposit terms.
CA-led tax litigation defense vs routine compliance filers
A routine tax filer uploads generic explanations that fail to answer technical queries, resulting in high-pitched assessment orders. GVC Audit builds an unassailable factual and legal paper trail that wins in appeal.
Technical Forensic Litigation Defense
- Partner-led supervision by CA Varundeep Gupta with deep direct tax appellate experience
- Detailed factual rebuttals backed by ledger extracts, third-party confirmations, and bank trails
- Citing binding High Court, Supreme Court, and jurisdictional Delhi ITAT precedents
- Challenging technical jurisdiction defects under Section 148A and limitation breaches
- Securing formal Stay of Demand under Section 220(6) to prevent bank account attachments
- Representing clients before NFAC, CIT(Appeals), DRP, and arguing before the Delhi ITAT
Superficial Document Upload
- Uploads bare ITR receipts and bank statements without explanatory legal submissions
- Fails to reconcile balance sheet discrepancies with AIS, TIS, and GSTR-9 portal data
- Misses the mandatory 30-day limitation deadline for filing Form 35 before CIT(A)
- Accepts arbitrary ex-parte additions under Section 144 without requesting video hearings
- Leaves bank accounts vulnerable to coercive recovery and garnishee orders under Section 226
- Cannot compile statutory ITAT paper-books or represent appeals before judicial members
Comprehensive assessment, reassessment, and appellate services
From responding to initial scrutiny inquiries and Section 148 notices to arguing appeals before CIT(A), DRP, and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Faceless Scrutiny & Reassessment Defense
Handling Section 143(3) scrutiny and Section 148 reassessment proceedings before the NFAC.
- Review of inquiries under Section 142(1) and drafting comprehensive factual submissions
- Reconciling financial ledgers with Annual Information Statement (AIS) and 26AS records
- Responding to Section 148A(b) show cause notices challenging reassessment jurisdiction
- Filing objections against draft assessment orders and requesting video conferencing hearings
CIT(Appeals) & JCIT(Appeals) Representation (Form 35)
Drafting and prosecuting statutory appeals challenging adverse assessment orders.
- Detailed review of assessment orders to identify factual and legal grounds of appeal
- Drafting precise Grounds of Appeal and comprehensive Statement of Facts in Form 35
- Filing Rule 46A applications for admitting additional documentary evidence
- Drafting written submissions and legal rejoinders during faceless appellate proceedings
ITAT Representation & Paper-Book Compilation
Representing corporate and individual assessees before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
- Drafting statutory Appeal Memos in Form 36 and Cross-Objections in Form 36A
- Compiling indexed, certified ITAT Paper-Books matching Tribunal rules
- Formulating case law digests citing Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, and Tribunal rulings
- Arguing stay petitions before the Tribunal Bench to freeze coercive tax recovery
Stay of Demand & Penalty Defense
Halting recovery proceedings and defending penalty notices under Section 270A / 271.
- Drafting Stay of Demand applications under Section 220(6) before the Assessing Officer and Pr. CIT
- Negotiating 20% demand deposit terms or seeking complete waiver in high-pitched cases
- Preventing and lifting bank account attachment orders issued under Section 226(3)
- Defending penalty proceedings under Section 270A (under-reporting / misreporting)
Stay
How to secure a Stay of Demand and prevent bank account attachments
When an Assessing Officer passes an adverse assessment order, a Notice of Demand under Section 156 is served, granting only thirty days to pay the assessed tax, interest, and penalties. Filing an appeal before the CIT(Appeals) does NOT automatically stay recovery. Unless a formal Stay of Demand application is filed, the department can initiate coercive recovery: attaching corporate bank accounts under Section 226(3) and debiting trade receivables.
Under CBDT Office Memorandums (Instruction No. 1914 as amended), the Assessing Officer shall grant a stay of demand pending first appeal upon payment of a standard deposit of 20% of the disputed demand. Where the assessment is high-pitched, based on conflicting High Court precedents, or where 20% payment causes severe financial hardship, an application can be escalated to the Principal CIT for a lower deposit or total waiver.
- Section 220(6) Application: Filed immediately with the Assessing Officer upon submitting Form 35 before the CIT(A)
- 20% Standard Deposit: Payment of 20% of the disputed demand via Challan 280 halts all coercive recovery actions
- Escalation to Pr. CIT: If the AO rejects the stay or insists on full payment, an administrative petition lies before the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
- Tribunal Stay Petition: If the appeal is before the ITAT, a formal Stay Application can be moved directly before the Tribunal Bench
- Lifting Bank Attachments: If bank accounts are already attached under Section 226(3), securing a stay order immediately releases operational accounts
Statutory limitation periods across the appellate ladder
Missing a statutory appeal limitation period forfeits your legal remedy. Here are the hard deadlines governed by the statute.
Income Tax Assessment & Appeal Readiness Checklist
Five critical parameters to verify before filing your appeal in Form 35 or submitting a scrutiny reply before the NFAC.
Audit my tax litigation file ↗- The notice or assessment order carries a valid Document Identification Number (DIN)Any income tax communication issued without a computer-generated DIN is legally invalid under CBDT Circular No. 19/2019.
- The date of service of the order is verified to calculate the 30-day limitationConfirm the exact date the assessment order was received via email or portal to compute the Form 35 filing window.
- All additions are supported by specific Grounds of Appeal and Statement of FactsGrounds must be concise, un-argumentative, and address every factual addition and legal disallowance separately.
- A Stay of Demand application under Section 220(6) is prepared alongside Form 35Ensure stay applications are submitted immediately to protect corporate bank accounts from attachment.
- Transitional applicability between 1961 Act and 2025 Act is clearly establishedConfirm whether substantive additions and limitation procedures are governed by the 1961 Act or 2025 Act based on the relevant tax year.
Chartered Accountants defending your tax position before appellate forums
Partner-Led Litigation Advocacy
CA Varundeep Gupta personally oversees your assessment replies, appeal drafting, and ITAT paper-book compilation, ensuring institutional-grade direct tax advocacy.
Deep Jurisdictional & ITAT Experience
Extensive experience appearing before the National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi Benches of the ITAT, and resolving complex Section 148 and Section 68/69 additions across Gurgaon and Manesar.
1961 & 2025 Dual-Act Mastery
We provide clear legal differentiation between legacy proceedings under the 1961 Act and new proceedings under the Income-tax Act, 2025, ensuring zero procedural defaults.
Complete direct tax, corporate, and audit advisory.
Facing an income tax notice, high-pitched assessment order, or tax demand?
Schedule a 30-minute consultation with CA Varundeep Gupta to review your tax notice, draft your appeal in Form 35, and secure a Stay of Demand under Section 220(6).
Income Tax Assessments & Appeals in Gurgaon: CA-Led Defense & Litigation
Under the direct tax framework in India, an income tax assessment is the statutory procedure through which the Income Tax Department examines a taxpayer's returns, financial accounts, bank statements, and transactions to determine the correct taxable income and tax liability. When the Assessing Officer makes arbitrary additions, disallows legitimate business expenditures, or assesses high-pitched tax demands, the taxpayer has a statutory right to challenge the order before independent appellate authorities.
Gurgaon stands as one of India's most scrutinized tax jurisdictions, housing high-net-worth individuals, tech executives in Cyber City, real estate developers on Golf Course Road, and automotive manufacturing enterprises in IMT Manesar. In this high-value financial environment, taxpayers frequently receive notices for Faceless Scrutiny under Section 143(3), Reassessment for escaped income under Section 148, Unexplained cash credits under Section 68 / 69, and Transfer Pricing adjustments under Section 92CA. Navigating these proceedings requires rigorous forensic accounting and direct tax litigation advocacy.
GVC Audit (Gupta Varundeep & Co.) is a premier Chartered Accountant firm based in Sushant Lok-1, Sector 43, Gurugram. We provide comprehensive, partner-led direct tax litigation advisory: scrutiny response drafting, Section 148 reassessment defense, CIT(Appeals) representation in Form 35, ITAT advocacy in Form 36, Stay of Demand under Section 220(6), and transitional advisory navigating proceedings under the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the Income-tax Act, 2025.
Transitional Framework: Income-tax Act, 1961 vs Income-tax Act, 2025
India's direct tax framework transitioned to the Income-tax Act, 2025 effective from 1 April 2026. However, specific repeal and savings provisions ensure that existing matters remain governed by the law applicable to the relevant tax year:
| Proceeding Category | Assessment Years Ending Till 31 March 2027 | Tax Year 2026–27 and Subsequent Years |
|---|---|---|
| Governing Legislation | Governed strictly by the Income-tax Act, 1961, including all substantive and procedural provisions. | Governed by the Income-tax Act, 2025, featuring reorganized section numbering and consolidated procedures. |
| Scrutiny & Reassessment | Assessments under Section 143(3) and Reassessments under Section 147/148 continue under 1961 Act timelines. | New assessment inquiries and return verifications executed under corresponding 2025 Act provisions. |
| Appeals & Tribunal | Appeals filed before CIT(A) (Form 35) or ITAT (Form 36) for earlier years remain governed by 1961 Act jurisprudence. | Fresh appeals for Tax Year 2026-27 onwards filed under updated 2025 Act statutory rules. |
| Penalties & Revisions | Penalty proceedings under Section 270A / 271 and Revision petitions under Section 264 continue under old Act. | Penalties and statutory revisions governed by the consolidated penalty framework of the 2025 Act. |
Types of Income Tax Assessments & Defense Strategy
Our direct tax litigation team represents assessees across all statutory assessment categories:
1. Faceless Scrutiny Assessment (Section 143(3))
Selected via the Computer-Assisted Scrutiny Selection (CASS) system for Limited or Complete Scrutiny. We draft detailed factual submissions, reconcile P&L accounts with GSTR-9, analyze AIS/TIS entries, respond to show-cause notices with draft assessment orders, and request video hearings before the National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC).
2. Reassessment Proceedings (Section 147 / 148 / 148A)
Initiated when the department claims income has escaped assessment. We examine the information relied upon by the Assessing Officer, draft formal objections under Section 148A(b) challenging the validity of the inquiry, verify whether mandatory approval from the specified authority was obtained, and challenge time-barred notices.
3. Unexplained Cash Credits & Investments (Section 68, 69, 69A)
Additions made for unexplained share capital, unsecured loans, or bank cash deposits, attracting punitive tax at 60% plus 25% surcharge and 4% cess (Effective 78%) under Section 115BBE. We establish the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions through bank statements, ITR acknowledgments, and confirmation letters.
First Appeal before CIT(Appeals) & JCIT(Appeals): Form 35
When an assessment order makes unjustified additions, an appeal lies before the First Appellate Authority:
- 30-Day Mandatory Window: Form 35 must be filed electronically on the income tax portal within 30 days from the date of service of the assessment order and Section 156 demand notice.
- Grounds of Appeal & Statement of Facts: Formulating precise grounds of appeal addressing each factual addition and legal disallowance separately. The Statement of Facts must narrate the complete chronology and rebut every adverse finding in the assessment order.
- Rule 46A Additional Evidence: If critical documentary evidence could not be submitted during assessment due to genuine reasons (such as illness, portal glitches, or ungranted adjournments), we file a formal application under Rule 46A to admit fresh evidence during the appeal.
Tribunal Litigation before the ITAT Delhi Benches: Form 36
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) is the final fact-finding authority under the direct tax framework:
| Litigation Element | Statutory Mandate under ITAT Rules | GVC Audit Practice Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Filing Window & Form 36 | Must be filed within 60 days of receiving the CIT(Appeals) order. | Drafting Appeal Memo in Form 36, formulating legal grounds, and calculating statutory appeal fees. |
| ITAT Paper-Book | Compilation of all documentary evidence submitted before lower authorities. | Compiling certified, indexed Paper-Books with page-to-page referencing, balance sheets, and bank statements. |
| Case Law Digest | Judicial precedents supporting the taxpayer's legal proposition. | Researching and citing binding Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, and jurisdictional Tribunal bench decisions. |
| Tribunal Stay Petitions | Stay of recovery proceedings pending final appeal hearing. | Drafting and arguing formal Stay Petitions before the ITAT Bench to restrain coercive bank attachments. |
High Court Appeals (Section 260A) & Writ Petitions (Article 226)
Beyond the Tribunal, judicial remedies lie before the High Court of Punjab & Haryana (for Haryana jurisdiction) or Delhi High Court:
- Section 260A Statutory Appeals: An appeal lies to the High Court within 120 days from the ITAT order, strictly on a Substantial Question of Law. The High Court does not re-evaluate pure questions of fact.
- Writ Petitions under Article 226: Filing Constitutional Writ Petitions challenging arbitrary reassessment notices under Section 148, lack of natural justice (denial of personal hearing), or orders passed without jurisdiction.
How GVC Audit Powers Your Tax Litigation Defense
1. Notice Review & Jurisdictional Analysis
We review the income tax notice, identify the tax year, determine whether the 1961 Act or 2025 Act applies, and audit Document Identification Number (DIN) validity.
2. Factual Reconstruction & Written Submissions
Our team reconstructs ledgers, prepares mathematical reconciliations against AIS/26AS, and drafts comprehensive factual and legal submissions for faceless assessment.
3. Appellate Drafting in Form 35 & Form 36
We draft rigorous Grounds of Appeal, Statements of Facts, compile certified ITAT Paper-Books, and represent clients before CIT(A), DRP, and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
4. Stay of Demand & Penalty Elimination
We secure formal Stay of Demand orders under Section 220(6) with 20% deposit terms, release attached bank accounts, and defend penalty notices under Section 270A.
Frequently Asked Questions: Assessment & Appeals in Gurgaon
What is the difference between an assessment and an appeal?
An assessment is the initial statutory examination by the Assessing Officer (or NFAC) to determine the taxpayer's correct income and tax liability. An appeal is a statutory remedy where the taxpayer challenges unjustified additions or disallowances passed in an assessment order before an independent appellate authority such as the CIT(Appeals) or ITAT.
Which Act governs my tax proceedings: Income-tax Act, 1961 or Income-tax Act, 2025?
Proceedings relating to tax years prior to 1 April 2026 (Assessment Years ending till 31 March 2027) continue to be governed by the Income-tax Act, 1961 under repeal and savings provisions. Proceedings relating to Tax Year 2026-27 onwards are governed by the Income-tax Act, 2025. The relevant law follows the tax year of the matter, not merely the date the notice was received.
What is the deadline for filing an appeal before the CIT(Appeals) in Form 35?
Under Section 249(2), an appeal in Form 35 must be filed electronically on the Income Tax portal within 30 days from the date of service of the assessment order and Notice of Demand under Section 156. Filing after 30 days requires submitting a formal Condonation of Delay application proving reasonable cause.
What is the 20% Stay of Demand rule under Section 220(6)?
Filing an appeal does not automatically stop tax recovery. Under CBDT guidelines, the Assessing Officer grants a stay of demand pending first appeal upon the taxpayer depositing 20% of the disputed tax demand. In cases of high-pitched assessments or severe financial hardship, applications can be escalated to the Principal CIT for a lower deposit or full stay.
What is a Section 148 notice and how can it be defended?
A Section 148 notice is issued to reopen a past assessment where the department claims income has escaped assessment. Defense involves reviewing the information provided under Section 148A(b), challenging whether the AO had genuine reason to believe, verifying statutory time limits, and filing detailed factual rebuttals under Section 148A(c).
What happens if a taxpayer does not respond to a Section 142(1) or 143(2) notice?
Failing to respond allows the Assessing Officer to pass a Best Judgment Assessment under Section 144, making arbitrary additions based on departmental data, levying peak tax rates, and initiating penalty proceedings under Section 270A alongside prosecution under Section 276D.
What is the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) and what is its role?
The ITAT is the second appellate authority and the final fact-finding body under direct tax law. Appeals are filed in Form 36 within 60 days of the CIT(A) order. The ITAT has the power to confirm, reduce, enhance, or annul assessment orders, or remand matters back for fresh examination.
Can fresh documentary evidence be produced during an appeal before CIT(A)?
Yes, under Rule 46A of the Income-tax Rules, additional evidence not produced before the Assessing Officer can be admitted if the appellant proves that the AO refused to admit it, was prevented by sufficient cause from producing it, or was not given reasonable opportunity during assessment.
What is Section 115BBE and why are cash credit additions so heavily taxed?
Additions made under Section 68 (unexplained cash credits), Section 69 (unexplained investments), or Section 69A (unexplained money) are taxed at a punitive rate of 60% + 25% surcharge + 4% cess (Effective 78%) under Section 115BBE, with zero deduction for expenses or loss set-offs.
What is a Document Identification Number (DIN) and why is it mandatory?
Under CBDT Circular No. 19/2019, any notice, order, or communication issued by the Income Tax Department without a computer-generated DIN is legally invalid and deemed never to have been issued.
Can an assessment order be challenged directly before the High Court?
Generally, statutory appellate remedies (CIT(A) and ITAT) must be exhausted first. However, a taxpayer can approach the High Court directly by filing a Writ Petition under Article 226 if the assessment order was passed in complete violation of natural justice, without statutory jurisdiction, or under an unconstitutional provision.
Do you represent taxpayers in income tax assessments and appeals outside Gurgaon?
Yes. GVC Audit is based in Sushant Lok-1, Sector 43, Gurugram, and we represent corporate entities, HNIs, and non-residents across Delhi NCR, appearing before the National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC-Appeals), and the ITAT Delhi Benches.
Chartered Accountants & Direct Tax Litigation Specialists in Gurgaon
Visit our Sushant Lok office for an in-person notice review, assessment rebuttal drafting, and appellate litigation consultation.
Gupta Varundeep & Co.
ICAI Certified Chartered Accountants
- AddressH-312, Sushant Shopping Arcade, near Huda Metro Station, Sushant Lok Phase I, Sector 43, Gurugram, Haryana 122009
- Phone+91 97173 55517
- Emailvarun@gvcaudit.com
- Office HoursMonday to Saturday, 10:00 AM to 7:00 PM